How is weather and climate related
Wildfire has far-reaching impacts that can ripple through communities, regions, watersheds, and ecosystems. This …. View Details Download pdf, KB. Tags Impacts Extreme Weather. As we saw once again in —the warmest year globally on record—increases in extreme weather and other climate-related impacts are imposing significant costs on society. Even as governments, companies and communities strengthen efforts to reduce emissions contributing to climate change, …. View Details Download pdf, 2 MB.
View Details Download pdf, 8 MB. Increased extreme weather and climate-related impacts are imposing significant costs on society and on companies. While businesses are increasingly taking steps to assess risks and prepare for future climate changes, many companies face internal and external challenges that hinder efforts ….
Munich Re reported that it was the third-costliest year on record behind and Many …. View Details. Climate Basics » Extreme Weather. Extreme Weather and Climate Change. Billion-Dollar Extreme Weather Events, Top 10 U. High winds and some flooding occurred in Ala.
A large region of extreme rainfall produced historic flooding across Houston and surrounding areas. More than 30 inches of rainfall fell on 6.
The resulting flooding displaced over 30, people and damaged or destroyed over , homes and businesses. Croix and made landfall in southeast Puerto Rico as a Category 4 and strengthened to a Category 5 storm. We talk a lot about climate these days, especially in the context of climate change. This is one of the reasons behind the shift toward use of the term climate change, which better reflects a situation that may seem counterintuitive—a change in climate involving an overall warming of the average temperature can lead to an increase in extreme weather events, including, in some cases, extreme cold weather.
To shed some light on the confusion that clouds the complex relationship between weather and climate , we need to go into more detail. Climate refers to the average atmospheric conditions that prevail in a given region over a long period of time—whether a place is generally cold and wet or hot and dry, for example. Is it cold? Is it raining or super dry? Is the sun out or are there clouds? Or you might say something like, We had some really hot weather yesterday.
People love talking about the weather because it affects our lives each and every day. Meteorology is popularly defined as the study of weather , and the weatherperson who delivers the weather forecasts on your local TV station is often referred to as a meteorologist.
As a verb, weather can mean to expose something to harsh conditions such as by placing it outside, in the weather , often in order to change it in some way, as in We need to weather this leather to soften it.
It can also mean to endure a storm or, more metaphorically, a negative or dangerous situation, as in We will simply have to weather the recession.
Whether or not you know the many meanings of weather , you should definitely educate yourself on these extreme weather words. Weather comes from the Old English weder, which is related to words for weather in other Germanic languages. The word weather ultimately shares the same root with the word wind , so wind and weather come from the same source!
In other words, climate involves the atmospheric conditions that prevail in general in a region, not just the atmospheric conditions messing with your commute today. A place could have a cold, rainy climate like the United Kingdom , or a hot, sunny, dry climate like Egypt. Whereas weather refers to short-term changes in the atmosphere, climate describes what the weather is like over a long period of time in a specific area.
Different regions can have different climates. To describe the climate of a place, we might say what the temperatures are like during different seasons , how windy it usually is, or how much rain or snow typically falls. When scientists talk about climate, they're often looking at averages of precipitation, temperature, humidity, sunshine, wind, and other measures of weather that occur over a long period in a particular place.
In some instances, they might look at these averages over 30 years. And, we refer to these three-decade averages of weather observations as Climate Normals. Looking at Climate Normals can help us describe whether the summers are hot and humid and whether the winters are cold and snowy at a particular place. They can also tell us when we might expect the warmest day of the year or the coldest day of the year at that location.
Weather tells you what to wear each day. Climate tells you what types of clothes to have in your closet. Across the globe, observers and automated stations measure weather conditions at thousands of locations every day of the year.
Some observations are made hourly, others just once a day. As the report put it:. Another important point is that in cases where attribution science finds that climate change is making a given type of extreme weather more likely, it does not necessarily follow that the chance of experiencing that kind of weather gets incrementally higher each year.
Natural variability means that there will still be ups and downs in the strength and frequency of extreme events. Finally, there is usually a level of confidence attached to attribution results. So, while two studies might both find a role for human influence in a given weather event, the signal may be stronger for one than the other.
For the purposes of this analysis, the attribution map does not distinguish between high- and low-confidence results, but users can click through to each study for more details.
That there is a more divided set of results for extreme rainfall than for heatwaves could suggest several things. In other cases, an inconclusive result could reflect the fact that rainfall or flooding events are inherently more complex than heatwaves, with many ways for natural variability to play a role. Human factors, such as land use and drainage, also play a part in whether heavy rain leads to flooding. Take the UK, for example. This raises another important point.
When it comes to interpreting the results of event attribution studies, it matters what the question is. For example, a study asked whether recent wet summers in northwestern European were a response to retreating Arctic sea ice pdf, p The paper notes that, in a chaotic weather system, the complex dynamics of the atmosphere mean the size and path of a storm or heavy rainfall event has a large element of chance.
This can make it tricky to identify where climate change fits in, potentially underestimating its influence. Higher temperatures mean warmer seas, higher sea levels and more moisture evaporating into the atmosphere.
These are changes that scientists can be more confident in, the authors write, and so should be the focus for attribution studies — rather than looking at changes to circulation patterns in the atmosphere. For example, the paper reexamines an earlier study pdf, p15 that suggested climate change had reduced the chances of the five-day heavy rainfall event that hit north-east Colorado in September Trenberth and colleagues argue that while climate change might not have made the specific weather system that brought the rain more likely, it will have contributed to the sheer volume of moisture in the atmosphere.
While attribution studies of heatwaves are generally more straightforward than storms — as they focus on thermodynamic influences — the type of question they are asking is still important.
The Russian heatwave in is a good example of this. One study looking at the severity of the event did not find a role for climate change. Yet another one , which did find an influence, looked at the likelihood of the event. This apparent contradiction is tackled by a third study that reconciles the other two. It is also important to stress that the absence of evidence for a link to climate change is not the same as evidence of absence.
In other words, it does not necessarily mean there was no human influence, just that a particular analysis did not find one. This is why a single study should never be considered the final word on how climate change influences a given type of extreme weather. Capetonians queue for water at natural springs around the city during the water crisis, January This mixed bag of results reflects the inherent complexity of droughts. And, again, the specific question matters.
Conclusions about the role of climate change in a specific drought could depend on whether a study looks at temperature, precipitation or soil moisture, for example.
While much has been achieved in the field of extreme event attribution in a short space of time, scientists are constantly looking for ways to tailor their work to suit the people who might use it. One major goal since the early days of the field has been to expand extreme event attribution to cover a larger and more diverse geographical area. Where in the world scientists can carry out attribution studies — and for what kind of events — will always be limited by the quality and availability of observed data and appropriate models.
The attribution map highlights, for example, that there are relatively few studies of extreme weather in Africa and South America. But, at the moment, there is also a heavy leaning towards weather events that are local to the modelling groups, or that have a particular scientific interest.
Otto explains:. The UK, California and Boulder [in Colorado] are, therefore, studied much more than other parts of the world, but that does not necessarily make them places particularly impacted by climate change.
0コメント